<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel><title> BuzzNotes | Comments</title><description>Anything that's going on, and sometimes Lotus Notes</description><link>http://giuliocc.dominodeveloper.net/</link><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 4 Jul 2008 07:07:06 AM -0700</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<title>Woot! A Lotus Collaboration Conference... if you can afford it.</title>
<pubDate>Fri, 4 Jul 2008 07:07:06 AM -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Giulio</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Woot! A Lotus Collaboration Conference... if you can afford it.</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[LOL...Given the way the US Dollar is trading at the moment... they may want to convert all prices into Mexican Peso!<br /><br />But given that they haven't even said what venue tells me they are going to set the venue once they get some firm numbers. And I doubt it's gonna be Darling Harbour.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[LOL...Given the way the US Dollar is trading at the moment... they may want to convert all prices into Mexican Peso!<br /><br />But given that they haven't even said what venue tells me they are going to set the venue once they get some firm numbers. And I doubt it's gonna be Darling Harbour.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://giuliocc.dominodeveloper.net/dx/07032008042153PMBLOVE8.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#07042008070706AMBLOJKH.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Woot! A Lotus Collaboration Conference... if you can afford it.</title>
<pubDate>Fri, 4 Jul 2008 12:57:00 AM -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Woot! A Lotus Collaboration Conference... if you can afford it.</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[They probably locked the prices in Czech crowns and as it is getting stronger and stronger everything else must be expensive to get the same amount :)<br /><br />Or maybe they just have a fix amount of money the conference costs and as they count there wouldn't be that much people in Australia it has to be more expensive.<br /><br />Anyway, it is really expensive and 5+1 doesn't make any sense for me, maybe 2+1?]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[They probably locked the prices in Czech crowns and as it is getting stronger and stronger everything else must be expensive to get the same amount :)<br /><br />Or maybe they just have a fix amount of money the conference costs and as they count there wouldn't be that much people in Australia it has to be more expensive.<br /><br />Anyway, it is really expensive and 5+1 doesn't make any sense for me, maybe 2+1?]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://giuliocc.dominodeveloper.net/dx/07032008042153PMBLOVE8.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#04.07.2008005700BLOBC7.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>We now resume your normal programme...</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Jun 2008 06:03:50 AM -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Giulio</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>We now resume your normal programme...</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[LOL...Yeah. They are not forthcoming with advice on the uptime/downtime. <br /><br />If I wasn't so busy, I would have a go at it myself from home as I have a static IP address. Actually, is there any good (ie simple) guides on setting up a personal server from a SOHO location with a static IP address ?]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[LOL...Yeah. They are not forthcoming with advice on the uptime/downtime. <br /><br />If I wasn't so busy, I would have a go at it myself from home as I have a static IP address. Actually, is there any good (ie simple) guides on setting up a personal server from a SOHO location with a static IP address ?]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://giuliocc.dominodeveloper.net/dx/20071008165614BLOW3Q.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#06032008060350AMBLOHBX.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>We now resume your normal programme...</title>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 02:35:56 PM -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Pepa</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>We now resume your normal programme...</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Yes. And yesterday DDN was offline for almost 24 hours!]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yes. And yesterday DDN was offline for almost 24 hours!]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://giuliocc.dominodeveloper.net/dx/20071008165614BLOW3Q.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#30.05.2008143556BLOTBZ.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Pitfalls of freeware</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:13:12 PM -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Giulio</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Pitfalls of freeware</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Rob,<br /><br />Point taken. I know it's not that long since the release of 8.1. I appreciate that you have taken the time to respond to my blog and provide first-hand info.<br /><br />It's not uncommon for lag time between vendors of inter-related products.<br /><br />I wanted to point out the potential "rock and a hard place" you can find yourself if you start to depend on freeware solutions, which is why I said testing is critical in this case if the s/w is going to be part of your business solution.<br /><br />Specifically, in an early release of Quickr I was able to crash the Quickr server simply by trying to delete a document in a place as a regular user. Nothing to do with the SNAPPs templates though. <br /><br />So, if a patch is released to fix that, but also breaks the freeware, then you got a problem. Quickr is also a little special simply because of the rate of hot-fixes coming out. <br /><br />It's evident that IBM is driven by date-oriented deadlines, and are bringing up the rear, post-release.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Rob,<br /><br />Point taken. I know it's not that long since the release of 8.1. I appreciate that you have taken the time to respond to my blog and provide first-hand info.<br /><br />It's not uncommon for lag time between vendors of inter-related products.<br /><br />I wanted to point out the potential "rock and a hard place" you can find yourself if you start to depend on freeware solutions, which is why I said testing is critical in this case if the s/w is going to be part of your business solution.<br /><br />Specifically, in an early release of Quickr I was able to crash the Quickr server simply by trying to delete a document in a place as a regular user. Nothing to do with the SNAPPs templates though. <br /><br />So, if a patch is released to fix that, but also breaks the freeware, then you got a problem. Quickr is also a little special simply because of the rate of hot-fixes coming out. <br /><br />It's evident that IBM is driven by date-oriented deadlines, and are bringing up the rear, post-release.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://giuliocc.dominodeveloper.net/dx/04152008075140PMBLO5DD.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#24042008211312BLO6YB.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Pitfalls of freeware</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 03:22:50 AM -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Rob Novak</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Pitfalls of freeware</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Guilio,<br /><br />Here is where I point out that Quickr 8.1 has been released for 19 business days, and was released with a bad upload control (very necessary for customization) that has only been stable for a couple days now.<br /><br />We do have a close relationship with IBM and early code, but even with that in mind -- well your last sentence above sums it up for me! The Quickr 8.1 beta program was very short this time.<br /><br />So - unofficially - we are now down to a matter of days not weeks, whittling away at it. The reason there is no official statement is that working on the free software has to be put aside from time to time for client support and project delivery, to pay the bills. That in mind, for 11 applications, isn't a month or even six weeks reasonable? If a company had 10+ custom Notes or Domino applications, wouldn't there be the same expectation of a post-release delay?<br /><br />Stay tuned.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Guilio,<br /><br />Here is where I point out that Quickr 8.1 has been released for 19 business days, and was released with a bad upload control (very necessary for customization) that has only been stable for a couple days now.<br /><br />We do have a close relationship with IBM and early code, but even with that in mind -- well your last sentence above sums it up for me! The Quickr 8.1 beta program was very short this time.<br /><br />So - unofficially - we are now down to a matter of days not weeks, whittling away at it. The reason there is no official statement is that working on the free software has to be put aside from time to time for client support and project delivery, to pay the bills. That in mind, for 11 applications, isn't a month or even six weeks reasonable? If a company had 10+ custom Notes or Domino applications, wouldn't there be the same expectation of a post-release delay?<br /><br />Stay tuned.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://giuliocc.dominodeveloper.net/dx/04152008075140PMBLO5DD.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#04242008032250AMBLOE7B.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Power of Blogging: Amplify your incompetence.</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 13:30:12 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Jason Reid</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Power of Blogging: Amplify your incompetence.</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Also - at some point over Spring/Summer they also do 'Rocks Market at Night' where they have free bands and such. I think they may be on during the week too :-)]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Also - at some point over Spring/Summer they also do 'Rocks Market at Night' where they have free bands and such. I think they may be on during the week too :-)]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://giuliocc.dominodeveloper.net/dx/20071025181307BLO3FS.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#13112007133012BLOT8H.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Energizers wrap up</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Nov 2007 18:42:48 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Giulio</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Energizers wrap up</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Although I have no technical knowledge of the way Symphony and the openOffice core has been integrated, I would have thought that the purpose of using an openOffice tool-set was to make it easier to incorporate upgrades.<br /><br />I just saw the announcement for beta 2.<br /><br />{ <a href="http://symphony.lotus.com/software/lotus/symphony/supportThread.jspa?threadID=3336&tstart=0" target="_blank" title="Link: symphony.lotus.com/software/lotus/symphony/supportThread.jspa?threadID=3336&tstart=0">Link</a> }<br /><br />It's obvious that this can be a huge threat to MS-Office licensing as it only takes one release to the 120M users to shake things up. I think this approach is better positioned than the Google's "Google docs". So although I am a bit critical, I just want to see Symphony dish out some serious competition to MS.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Although I have no technical knowledge of the way Symphony and the openOffice core has been integrated, I would have thought that the purpose of using an openOffice tool-set was to make it easier to incorporate upgrades.<br /><br />I just saw the announcement for beta 2.<br /><br />{ <a href="http://symphony.lotus.com/software/lotus/symphony/supportThread.jspa?threadID=3336&tstart=0" target="_blank" title="Link: symphony.lotus.com/software/lotus/symphony/supportThread.jspa?threadID=3336&tstart=0">Link</a> }<br /><br />It's obvious that this can be a huge threat to MS-Office licensing as it only takes one release to the 120M users to shake things up. I think this approach is better positioned than the Google's "Google docs". So although I am a bit critical, I just want to see Symphony dish out some serious competition to MS.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://giuliocc.dominodeveloper.net/dx/20071105170506BLO3AR.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#06112007184248BLO57T.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Energizers wrap up</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Nov 2007 17:24:07 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Gavin Bollard</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Energizers wrap up</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Ed spent a bit too much time on Symphony. I liked the question about the OpenOffice 1.1 codebase though. <br /><br />Strange that with 35 developers, there was no commitment to a time frame for upgrading to a later codebase.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ed spent a bit too much time on Symphony. I liked the question about the OpenOffice 1.1 codebase though. <br /><br />Strange that with 35 developers, there was no commitment to a time frame for upgrading to a later codebase.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://giuliocc.dominodeveloper.net/dx/20071105170506BLO3AR.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#11052007052407PMBLO3NM.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Power of Blogging: Amplify your incompetence.</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 21:33:11 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Giulio</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Power of Blogging: Amplify your incompetence.</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[That's a good one... But an obvious error, in my case it's evident I just didn't read something properly. Great thing about the internet, everything is permanent for years and years and years]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[That's a good one... But an obvious error, in my case it's evident I just didn't read something properly. Great thing about the internet, everything is permanent for years and years and years]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://giuliocc.dominodeveloper.net/dx/20071025181307BLO3FS.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#25102007213311BLO7CS.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Power of Blogging: Amplify your incompetence.</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 20:46:40 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Gavin Bollard</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Power of Blogging: Amplify your incompetence.</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Heck, you think that's bad... <br /><br />On one post I was replying to a high-profile online journal and was talking about IBM and Microsoft. I meant to remind people that Ray Ozzie was the man behind Lotus Notes and I accidentally typed Bill Gates and hit submit...<br /><br />I've since seen my comment crop up in more than a couple of searches and I'm embarrassed every time.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Heck, you think that's bad... <br /><br />On one post I was replying to a high-profile online journal and was talking about IBM and Microsoft. I meant to remind people that Ray Ozzie was the man behind Lotus Notes and I accidentally typed Bill Gates and hit submit...<br /><br />I've since seen my comment crop up in more than a couple of searches and I'm embarrassed every time.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://giuliocc.dominodeveloper.net/dx/20071025181307BLO3FS.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#10252007084640PMBLO6FQ.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>More on Symphony... Where&#8217;s save as .wks ?</title>
<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 17:33:15 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Giulio</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>More on Symphony... Where&#8217;s save as .wks ?</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Thanks Kevin....I am checking out Alex's solution. Should be handy... There seems to be a few flavours of this sort of thing. Supporting Lotus 123 in Symphony, I would have thought, been a no-brainer. Will wait and see what may happen for 8.0.1...]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Thanks Kevin....I am checking out Alex's solution. Should be handy... There seems to be a few flavours of this sort of thing. Supporting Lotus 123 in Symphony, I would have thought, been a no-brainer. Will wait and see what may happen for 8.0.1...]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://giuliocc.dominodeveloper.net/dx/20071018165454BLOW2V.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#21102007173315BLO2NU.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>More on Symphony... Where&#8217;s save as .wks ?</title>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 10:07:42 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Kevin Pettitt</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>More on Symphony... Where&#8217;s save as .wks ?</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Just for you: { <a href="http://www.lotusguru.com/lotusguru/LGBlog.nsf/d6plinks/20071019-7858V7" target="_blank" title="Link: www.lotusguru.com/lotusguru/LGBlog.nsf/d6plinks/20071019-7858V7">Link</a> }<br /><br />:-)]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Just for you: { <a href="http://www.lotusguru.com/lotusguru/LGBlog.nsf/d6plinks/20071019-7858V7" target="_blank" title="Link: www.lotusguru.com/lotusguru/LGBlog.nsf/d6plinks/20071019-7858V7">Link</a> }<br /><br />:-)]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://giuliocc.dominodeveloper.net/dx/20071018165454BLOW2V.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#10192007100742AMBLON4D.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Productivity tools ? Well.. sorta...</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 16:18:38 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Giulio</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Productivity tools ? Well.. sorta...</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[At my office we were all instructed to use the productivity tools over ms-office, to test it out. <br /><br />But it looks like we've reverted to MS-Office for the time-being. Producing documentation though in a "native" format is something I am still quite interested in though regardless. Being able to produce doco easily on a server/client without an MS-office install is liberating.<br /><br />I have tested out iText and it's quite good for pdf construction through java, but it's a little tedious.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[At my office we were all instructed to use the productivity tools over ms-office, to test it out. <br /><br />But it looks like we've reverted to MS-Office for the time-being. Producing documentation though in a "native" format is something I am still quite interested in though regardless. Being able to produce doco easily on a server/client without an MS-office install is liberating.<br /><br />I have tested out iText and it's quite good for pdf construction through java, but it's a little tedious.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://giuliocc.dominodeveloper.net/dx/09182007052649PMBLO2JT.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#18102007161838BLOVC7.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Productivity tools ? Well.. sorta...</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 19:23:11 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Gavin Bollard</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Productivity tools ? Well.. sorta...</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[I know what you mean. I've been trying to use the productivity tools in Notes 8 but although they can open my existing MS Word templates, they don't seem to carry the styles properly.<br /><br />It's a pity because I rather preferred the integrated approach. Hopefully they'll update the client code quickly without us having to wait for regular Notes Client fix packs.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I know what you mean. I've been trying to use the productivity tools in Notes 8 but although they can open my existing MS Word templates, they don't seem to carry the styles properly.<br /><br />It's a pity because I rather preferred the integrated approach. Hopefully they'll update the client code quickly without us having to wait for regular Notes Client fix packs.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://giuliocc.dominodeveloper.net/dx/09182007052649PMBLO2JT.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#10172007072311PMBLO4TJ.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bloatware makes grumpy old men...</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 06:02:46 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Giulio</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Bloatware makes grumpy old men...</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[I know XP has been around for around 5 years now and is battle-hardened, unlike Vista. But alot of XP code is still buried in Vista, somewhere. <br /><br />A futile a commment this may be, but if you release an O/S, is it not unreasonable that it should run better than than the previous version ? It's almost like paying for pre-installed spam that just clutters your h/w and productivity !?!?<br /><br />I wonder if execs in the Dell's, Lenovo's, HP's etc, actually get a "special" build that avoids all the bloat ?<br /><br />H/W is virtually the same across all the major brands, so they pack on those utilities to "distinguish" themselves. But if they stop trying so hard to promote their brand through their builds via these useless and debilitating utilities, they might actually sell more h/w, as word would get around, (via reviews or otherwise), that their builds are best for IT departments. After all it's all about volume as far as they're concerned.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I know XP has been around for around 5 years now and is battle-hardened, unlike Vista. But alot of XP code is still buried in Vista, somewhere. <br /><br />A futile a commment this may be, but if you release an O/S, is it not unreasonable that it should run better than than the previous version ? It's almost like paying for pre-installed spam that just clutters your h/w and productivity !?!?<br /><br />I wonder if execs in the Dell's, Lenovo's, HP's etc, actually get a "special" build that avoids all the bloat ?<br /><br />H/W is virtually the same across all the major brands, so they pack on those utilities to "distinguish" themselves. But if they stop trying so hard to promote their brand through their builds via these useless and debilitating utilities, they might actually sell more h/w, as word would get around, (via reviews or otherwise), that their builds are best for IT departments. After all it's all about volume as far as they're concerned.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://giuliocc.dominodeveloper.net/dx/20071011175430BLO345.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#15102007060246BLOHBA.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bloatware makes grumpy old men...</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 23:35:15 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Gavin Bollard</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Bloatware makes grumpy old men...</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[I'd like to say it's just Lenovo, but we had the same problems with our Sony Vaios and our Dells.<br /><br />Also, I think you're being a mite unfair in comparing Vista to a well-established system like XP :-)]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'd like to say it's just Lenovo, but we had the same problems with our Sony Vaios and our Dells.<br /><br />Also, I think you're being a mite unfair in comparing Vista to a well-established system like XP :-)]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://giuliocc.dominodeveloper.net/dx/20071011175430BLO345.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#10112007113515PMBLO9R4.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>The worst software in the universre, MS-Word Bullet Points and Numbering.</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 07:01:22 PM -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Giulio</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>The worst software in the universre, MS-Word Bullet Points and Numbering.</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Point taken Richard. I wonder how MS came up with the UI behaviour specification for these edit widget-things anyway ? Because it sure isn't intuitive to me ?]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Point taken Richard. I wonder how MS came up with the UI behaviour specification for these edit widget-things anyway ? Because it sure isn't intuitive to me ?]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://giuliocc.dominodeveloper.net/dx/07092007105107PMBLO8VH.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#07112007070122PMBLO4DW.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>The worst software in the universre, MS-Word Bullet Points and Numbering.</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 07:48:45 PM -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Richard Schwartz</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>The worst software in the universre, MS-Word Bullet Points and Numbering.</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[I beg to differ. Second worst. Yes, it drives me crazy, too. My least favorite aspect of it is the "don't delete that page break, or else I'll screw with all your numbering, not to mention other formatting" feature. But it's still second worst, because 90% of what PowerPoint is supposed to be good at is managing bullets, yet even it can't get them right.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I beg to differ. Second worst. Yes, it drives me crazy, too. My least favorite aspect of it is the "don't delete that page break, or else I'll screw with all your numbering, not to mention other formatting" feature. But it's still second worst, because 90% of what PowerPoint is supposed to be good at is managing bullets, yet even it can't get them right.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://giuliocc.dominodeveloper.net/dx/07092007105107PMBLO8VH.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#07102007074845PMBLO5BJ.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Rumours of my demise have been greatly exaggerated....</title>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 06:17:56 PM -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ray Green</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Rumours of my demise have been greatly exaggerated....</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[...because of 1 to 10, I'm going to Darwin for my next hols.........<br /><br />..on 2nd thought, I think I'll stay at home.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[...because of 1 to 10, I'm going to Darwin for my next hols.........<br /><br />..on 2nd thought, I think I'll stay at home.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://giuliocc.dominodeveloper.net/dx/11142006084910PMBLO7NS.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#03182007061756PMBLO3JR.htm</link>
</item>

</channel></rss>
